Wilson v. Mitchell et al
Order to Vacate. The undersigned vacates the February 11, 2011 Report and Recommendation 22 . The Clerk is to re-issue the Roseboro order to Plaintiff and Plaintiff is instructed to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss by March 31, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 2/25/2011. (mcot, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Jose Luis Cruzado Wilson, Plaintiff, vs. Mary M. Mitchell, Lt. Bryant, Bureau of Prisons, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 1:10-2206-RBH-SVH
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff filed this action, which is construed as alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on January 4, 2011. [Entry #17]. As Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court entered an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), on January 5, 2011, advising him of the importance of a motion to dismiss and of the need for him to file an adequate response. [Entry #18]. The Roseboro order was returned to the Clerk of Court's office via United States Postal Service on February 1, 2011, marked "Return to Sender." [Entry #20]. Based on
Plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his address and the court's inability to contact him, the undersigned issued a Report and Recommendation on February 11, 2011 [Entry #22], recommending Plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On February 24, 2011, the Clerk of Court received a letter from Plaintiff indicating he has recently been in transit without his paperwork. Plaintiff also provided a new address. Based on the foregoing, the undersigned vacates the February 11, 2011 Report
and Recommendation. The Clerk is to re-issue the Roseboro order to Plaintiff and Plaintiff is instructed to respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss by March 31, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 25, 2011 Florence, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?