Sheppard v. Tyger River CI et al
Filing
100
ORDER denying 99 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 12/13/2011.(mcot, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
AIKEN DIVISION
Dexter Antonio Sheppard, #312344,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Warden Tim Riley and Sgt. Derrick
)
McBryar,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
C/A NO. 1:10-2424-CMC-SVH
OPINION and ORDER
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s pro se motion to Alter or Amend under Rule
59(e). ECF No. 99 (filed Dec. 12, 2011).
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has interpreted Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure to allow the court to alter or amend an earlier judgment: “‘(1) to accommodate an
intervening change in controlling law; (2) to account for new evidence not available at trial; or (3)
to correct a clear error of law or prevent manifest injustice.’” Becker v. Westinghouse Savannah
River Co., 305 F.3d 284, 290 (4th Cir. 2002) (quoting Pac. Ins. Co. v. Am. Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 148
F.3d 396, 403 (4th Cir. 1998)). “Whatever may be the purpose of Rule 59(e) it should not be
supposed that it is intended to give an unhappy litigant one additional chance to sway the judge.”
Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co., 130 F.R.D. 625 (S.D. Miss. 1990). Plaintiff does not seek to
reopen the judgment based upon the first two circumstances noted above. Therefore, it appears
Plaintiff seeks to reopen the judgment to prevent an alleged manifest injustice.
Plaintiff presents no evidence which leads this court to reconsider its previous ruling.
Plaintiff seemingly misconstrues his failure to exhaust available administrative remedies relating
1
to Defendant McBryar’s alleged use of excessive force with his attempt to appeal and/or exhaust
administrative remedies relating to the findings of a disciplinary hearing. The two are unrelated.
Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Cameron McGowan Currie
CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Columbia, South Carolina
December 13, 2011
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?