Frierson v. Tripp et al
Filing
64
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Magistrate Judge to consider plaintiff's response to defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 7/25/2011. (mcot, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Marcus Antonio Frierson,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Ofc. Tripp; Lt. B. Haney; Ms. Burch,
)
Mental Health; Nurse Felder-Gadson;
)
Nurse Ms. Manigolt; IGC Ms. Jinkins;
)
Ms. Gant, Ofc.: Ms. Conelly, Head
)
Nurse; Ofc. Gullet; Ms. Lee, Mental
)
Health; Ms. Chase, Nurse; Ms. James,
)
Nurse; Ms. Paquevacc, Nurse; Ms.
)
Andrews, Nurse; Ms. Conner, Mental
)
Health; Ms. Gray, Mental Health,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
Civil Action No. 1:10-3103 DCN SVH
This matter is before this court pursuant to plaintiff’s response to defendants’ motion for
summary judgment which was filed on July 11, 2011. In the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation, she recommended dismissal of plaintiff’s claims because plaintiff failed to
respond to defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and recommends this action be dismissed
for failure to prosecute.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Magistrate Judge to
consider plaintiff’s response to defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as plaintiff’s
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 25, 2011
Charleston, South Carolina
_____________________________
David C. Norton
Chief United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?