Frierson v. Tripp et al

Filing 64

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Magistrate Judge to consider plaintiff's response to defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 7/25/2011. (mcot, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Marcus Antonio Frierson, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Ofc. Tripp; Lt. B. Haney; Ms. Burch, ) Mental Health; Nurse Felder-Gadson; ) Nurse Ms. Manigolt; IGC Ms. Jinkins; ) Ms. Gant, Ofc.: Ms. Conelly, Head ) Nurse; Ofc. Gullet; Ms. Lee, Mental ) Health; Ms. Chase, Nurse; Ms. James, ) Nurse; Ms. Paquevacc, Nurse; Ms. ) Andrews, Nurse; Ms. Conner, Mental ) Health; Ms. Gray, Mental Health, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 1:10-3103 DCN SVH This matter is before this court pursuant to plaintiff’s response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment which was filed on July 11, 2011. In the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, she recommended dismissal of plaintiff’s claims because plaintiff failed to respond to defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and recommends this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Magistrate Judge to consider plaintiff’s response to defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, as well as plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and defendants’ Motion for Extension of Time. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. July 25, 2011 Charleston, South Carolina _____________________________ David C. Norton Chief United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?