Lydia v. Cherokee County Detention Center et al

Filing 76

ORDER denying 61 Motion for Subpoenas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 10/24/2011.(mcot, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Claude E. Lydia, Plaintiff, vs. Ms. Henderson, Officer; Ms. Luna, Officer; Ms. Blackwell, Officer; Mr. Lemmons, Officer, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 1:11-23-MBS-SVH ORDER Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his constitutional rights while he was a pretrial detainee incarcerated at Cherokee County Detention Center (“CCDC”). This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Subpoenas [Entry #61]. All pretrial proceedings in this case were referred to the undersigned pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d) (D.S.C.). Plaintiff’s motion for subpoenas requests twelve subpoenas in order to secure the presence of witnesses for Plaintiff. Although a subpoena is the proper method for compelling attendance of a witness at trial, Plaintiff has failed to provide the proper form or the necessary witness fees. There is no requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 that the court pay costs incurred with regard to a subpoena such as witness fees. See Badman v. Stark, 139 F.R.D. 601, 604 (M.D.Pa. 1991) (inmates proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 are not entitled to have their discovery costs underwritten or waived); Johnson v. Hubbard, 698 F.2d 286, 288–291 & nn. 2–5 (6th Cir.) (lower courts have no duty to pay fees to secure depositions in civil, non-habeas corpus cases), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 917 (1983); United States Marshals Serv. v. Means, 741 F.2d 1053, 1057 (8th Cir.1984) (holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c) does not require government payment of witness fees and costs for indigent plaintiffs in § 1983 suits). If Plaintiff wishes to obtain subpoenas, he may do so by contacting the Clerk of Court and providing the Clerk’s office with a completed Form AO 88 (Subpoena in a Civil Case), together with the necessary witness fees. Plaintiff will have ample time to submit the same after a trial date is set. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for subpoenas [Entry #61] is denied at this time with leave to re-file after he has tendered a properly completed AO 88 form and the necessary witness fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. October 24, 2011 Florence, South Carolina Shiva V. Hodges United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?