Smith v. Spivey et al

Filing 40

ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/6/2012.(abuc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Gregory V. Smith,
Plaintiff,
vs.
P.E. Spivey, Jail Director, Individual
andOfficial Capacity; and Chris Phillips,
Detective, Individual and Official
Capacity,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

C/A No.: 1:12-29-RBH-SVH

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983, alleging violations of his constitutional rights by employees of Kershaw County
Detention Center. Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel [Entry #33]. All
pretrial proceedings in this case were referred to the undersigned pursuant to the
provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2)(d) (D.S.C.).
Plaintiff’s motion to compel filed June 26, 2012 seeks responses to requests for
production issued in April 2012. In their response to the motion, Defendants indicate
counsel served discovery responses on Plaintiff on July 18, 2012 or otherwise objected.
[Entry #38] Plaintiff did not file a reply brief. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to compel
[Entry #33] is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

August 6, 2012
Columbia, South Carolina

Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge