Washington v. Cannon et al
Filing
22
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Anthony L. Washington,
Plaintiff
v.
)
)
)
)
Sheriff Al Cannon; Chief Mitch Lucas;FNU
LNU W/M Officer; FNU LNU S.O.G. B/M
Officer; FNU LNU S.O.G.W/M Officer;
C.C.O.H. Nurse Land; S.A.C.D.C. Injury
Negligence Insurance Policy Holder; C.C.O.H.
Injury Negligence Ins. Policy Holder,
Civil Action No.
1:12-cv-243-RBH
Defendant
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Anthony L. Washington, shall take nothing of the defendants, Sheriff Al Cannon, Chief
Mitch Lucas; FNU LNU W/M Officer; FNU LNU S.O.G. B/M Officer; FNU LNU S.O.G. W/M Officer; C.C.O.H.
Nurse Land; S.A.C.D.C. Injury Negligence Insurance Policy Holder; C.C.O.H. Injury Negligence Ins. Policy Holder, as
to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of
prosecution and for failure to comply with this court’s orders pursuant to Rule 41(b).
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge, presiding, which dismissed the
action without prejudice.
Date: June 11, 2012
CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?