Brisco v. Brown et al

Filing 40

JUDGMENT / The court ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice. (abuc)

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina

Daniel Thomas Brisco,

)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

v.
Officer Brown; Officer Arrowood,
Defendants,

Civil Action No.

1:12-cv-01294-MGL

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)

recover from the defendant (name)

which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of

dollars ($

),

%, along with

costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

O other: the plaintiff, Daniel Thomas Brisco, shall take nothing of the defendants, Officer Brown and Officer
Arrowood, as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and this action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
FRCP 41.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Honorable Mary G. Lewis, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and

Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which
dismissed the case with prejudice.
Date: March 25, 2013

LARRY W. PROPES, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk