Shockley v. Leeke et al

Filing 10

ORDER re 2 Complaint, filed by Larry Lee Shockley. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/19/2012. (abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Larry Lee Shockley, Plaintiff, vs. Nelson V Leeke, et al.; Byers, SCDC Director; Unknown(s), SCDC Defendants to be amended; Defendants. _________________________________________ ) C/A No. 1:12-01570-JMC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) Plaintiff is a state prisoner who, proceeding pro se, filed a com plaint concerning prison conditions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. By order issued on June 20, 2012, Plaintiff was given an opportunity to provide the necessary information and paperwork to bring the case into proper form for evaluation and possible service of process. [ECF No. 7]. Plaintiff was warned that f ailure to provide the necessary inform ation within the timetable set in the order would subject the case to dismissal. Plaintiff di d not respond to the order and the tim e for response has lapsed. Because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has ailed to comply with an order ofthis Court, the case f is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Fedeal Rules of Civil Procedure.See Link r v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. July 19, 2012. Greenville, South Carolina s/J. Michelle Childs J. Michelle Childs United States District Judge NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to ppeal this Order within the tim period set forth a e under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?