Heatley v. Leeke et al

Filing 10

ORDER re 2 Complaint, filed by Charles Heatley. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/24/2012. (abuc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Charles Heatley,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Nelson V Leeke, et al.;
Byers, SCDC Director;
Unknown(s), SCDC Defendants to be amended;
Defendants.
_________________________________________

) C/A No. 1:12-01610-JMC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner who, proceeding pro se, filed a com plaint concerning prison
conditions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order issued on June 25, 2012, Plaintiff was given an
opportunity to provide the necessary information and paperwork to bring the case into proper form
for evaluation and possible service of process. [ECF No. 7]. Plaintiff was warned that f ailure to
provide the necessary inform ation within the timetable set in the order would subject the case to
dismissal. Plaintiff di d not respond to the order and the tim e for response has lapsed. Because
Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has ailed to comply with an order ofthis Court, the case
f
is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Fedeal Rules of Civil Procedure.See Link
r
v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 24, 2012.
Greenville, South Carolina

s/J. Michelle Childs
J. Michelle Childs
United States District Judge
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to ppeal this Order within the tim period set forth
a
e
under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.