Rose v. Leeke et al

Filing 10

ORDER re 2 Complaint, filed by Donald Rose. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 7/25/2012. (abuc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Donald Rose,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Nelson V Leeke, et al.;
Byers, SCDC Director;
Unknown(s), SCDC Defendants to be amended;
Defendants.
_________________________________________

) C/A No. 1:12-01625-JMC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff is a state prisoner who, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint concerning prison
conditions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order issued on June 26, 2012, Plaintiff was given an
opportunity to provide the necessary information and paperwork to bring the case into proper form
for evaluation and possible service of process. [ECF No. 7]. Plaintiff was warned that failure to
provide the necessary information within the timetable set in the order would subject the case to
dismissal. Plaintiff did not respond to the order and the time for response has lapsed. Because
Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court, the case
is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link
v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 25, 2012.
Greenville, South Carolina

s/J. Michelle Childs
J. Michelle Childs
United States District Judge
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set forth
under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.