Allstate Indemnity Company v. Tilmon et al
Filing
38
ORDER granting 34 Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Roosevelt Tilmon and Mona Tilmon. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 4/21/2014.(asni, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
AIKEN DIVISION
Allstate Indemnity Company,
)
) Civil Action No.: 1:13-00690-JMC
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
) ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
)
)
Roosevelt Tilmon, Mona Tilmon and
)
AmyMelissa Davis, Individually and as
)
Legal Guardian for K.K.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
This matter is before the court on a motion by Plaintiff for a default judgment against
Defendants Roosevelt Tilmon and Mona Tilmon (the “Tilmon Defendants”). (ECF No. 34.) For the
reasons set forth below, the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion.
I.
Introduction
Plaintiff filed this declaratory judgment action on March 14, 2013, seeking a declaration
by the court as to the rights of the parties under the Deluxe Homeowners Insurance Policy No. 9
30 260240 01/26 issued to Roosevelt Tilmon (the “Tilmon Policy”). By order of this court, dated
March 21, 2014, the court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) on the
grounds that the Tilmon Policy does not provide coverage for the claims asserted in the
Underlying Lawsuit. (ECF No. 33.) Therefore, Plaintiff does not have any duty to either provide
the Tilmon Defendants with a defense or to indemnify them in the Underlying Lawsuit. (Id. at
13-14.)
A.
Jurisdiction and Venue
The court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1332 based on diversity of citizenship of the parties. Additionally, this insurance coverage action
is brought pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, as codified in 28
U.S.C. §§ 2201-2201, and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 57.
B.
Process and Service
On April 4, 2013, Plaintiff served the Tilmon Defendants with the summons and
complaint in this action, by certified mail return receipt requested and signed for by Mona
Tilmon. (ECF Nos. 9 and 10.)
C.
Grounds for Entry of Default
Neither of the Tilmon Defendants timely filed an answer or other pleading, as reflected by
the Affidavit of Default filed on May 6, 2013. (ECF No. 14-1.) The Clerk of Court properly
entered default as to the Tilmon Defendants on May 6, 2013. On March 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed
its Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 34) with Affidavit in Support (ECF No. 34-1).
II.
Findings of Fact
Having reviewed Plaintiff's Complaint, Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories,
Acceptance of Service Forms, Motion for Entry of Default, Motion for Default Judgment, as well
as all supporting and supplemental information provided, the court accepts Plaintiff's wellpleaded factual allegations as true and makes the following factual findings. See DIRECTV, Inc.
v. Rawlins, 523 F.3d 318, 322 n.2 (4th Cir. 2009) (accepting plaintiff's allegations against
defaulting defendant as true, noting a defaulting defendant "admits the plaintiff's well-pleaded
allegations of fact, is concluded on those facts by the judgment, and is barred from contesting on
appeal the facts thus established.") (quoting Ryan v. Homecomings Fin. Network, 253 F.3d 778,
780 (4th Cir. 2001)).
Having found the facts set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint as deemed admitted by default,
and additionally that the court granted summary judgment for Plaintiff in this declaratory
judgment action, the court finds and concludes that judgment should be entered in Plaintiff's
favor against the Tilmon Defendants.
WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED that a judgment in favor of Plaintiff Allstate Indemnity
Company be entered against Defendants Roosevelt Tilmon and Mona Tilmon declaring that the
policy issued by Plaintiff to Defendant Roosevelt Tilmon provides no coverage for the claims
asserted in the Underlying Lawsuit and that Plainitff has no duty to defend or indemnify
Defendant Roosevelt Tilmon or Mona Tilmon for the claims asserted in the Underlying Lawsuit.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ J. Michelle Childs
J. Michelle Childs
United States District Court Judge
Columbia, South Carolina
April 21, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?