James et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Filing 15

ORDER re 11 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Isiah James, Jr. Plaintiffs' answers to the court's special interrogatories are due by September 10, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 8/16/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Courts Special Interrogatories)(abuc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Isiah James, Jr.; and George Lee Tomlin, Plaintiffs, vs. South Carolina Department of Corrections, SCDC, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 1:13-1936-TLW-SVH Plaintiffs’ Answers to the Court’s Special Interrogatories Instructions Each Plaintiff is directed to answer the following questions as completely as possible in the space provided. If additional space is needed, attach a separate sheet of paper to this form and indicate which answer(s) are continued on the separate sheet. BE AWARE THAT YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE COMPLETELY TRUTHFUL AND ARE GIVEN UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. On July 26, 2013, Plaintiff James filed a motion to remand this case to state court. [Entry #11]. However, it is unclear from the motion whether Plaintiffs intend to rely solely on South Carolina state law in asserting their claims in this case. Further, it is unclear whether Plaintiff Tomlin also seeks remand of this case. 1. Do you intend to rely on South Carolina state law alone in asserting your claims in this case? Yes No ________ 2. Do you intend to assert any federal claims in this case, including claims of constitutional violations? Yes No ________ 3. Do you seek remand of this case to state court? Yes No ________ I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this ______ day of _______________, 2013. _________________________________________ Signature of Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?