James et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Filing 55

JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiffs' ninth cause of action. (abuc)

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina

Isiah James, Jr.; George Lee Tomlin
Plaintiff

v.

South Carolina Department of Corrections, SCDC,

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.

1:13-cv-01936-TLW

Defendants

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)

recover from the defendant (name)

which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of

dollars ($

),

%, along with

costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

O the plaintiffs, Isiah James, Jr. and George Lee Tomlin, take nothing of the defendant, South Carolina Department of
Corrections, as to the ninth cause of action and, this action is dismissed with prejudice as to that cause of action.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Honorable Terry L. Wooten, Chief United States District Judge, presiding. The Court having adopted
the Report and Recommendation of US Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges, which recommended dismissal of the
Plaintiffs’ ninth cause of action.
Date: March 19, 2014

ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk