Bryant v. Byars et al
ORDER LIFTING STAY Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/13/2017. (bgoo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
James N. Bryant, III,
William R. Byars, Director, South
Carolina Department of Corrections,
Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution,
C/A No.: 1:13-2665-BHH-SVH
ORDER LIFTING STAY
Petitioner James Nathaniel Bryant III (“Bryant”) is a state prisoner convicted of
murder and armed robbery and sentenced to death. On September 27, 2013, counsel for
Bryant filed a petition for habeas corpus on his behalf.
[ECF No. 14.]
September 27, 2013, Bryant’s counsel filed a motion to stay his federal habeas corpus
action pending the exhaustion of various claims in state court. [ECF No. 16.] This court
granted the motion to stay on November 22, 2013. [ECF No. 35.] Counsel has now filed
a status report indicating that Bryant’s second post-conviction relief action has been
dismissed in state court.1 [ECF No. 58.] Accordingly, it appears to the court that it is
now appropriate to lift the stay of this action and resume briefing.
The stay of this action is hereby lifted.
The court has issued a notice of a
telephonic status conference with the parties on October 16, 2017 at 10:30 a.m. At that
time, Petitioner’s counsel should be prepared to advise the Court whether Petitioner
Bryant’s counsel submitted the status report pursuant to this court’s order directing the
parties to advise the court within five days of the resolution of the state court
proceedings. [See ECF No. 58.]
would like his motion to amend/correct [ECF No. 33] reinstated. Additionally, counsel
for both parties should be prepared to discuss scheduling of further briefing in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 13, 2017
Columbia, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?