Bryant v. Byars et al
Filing
95
JUDGMENT accepting in part the US Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, granting in part Respondents' motion for summary judgment, granting in part Petitioner's amended petition and vacating the death sentence. (lbak)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
James N Bryant,III,
Petitioner
v.
Warden Lieber Correctional Institution; Bryan
Stirling.
Respondent
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
1:13-cv-02665-BHH
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the petitioner (name)
recover from the respondent (name)
the amount of
dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with costs.
’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the petitioner (name)
.
O other: Summary Judgment is entered for the respondents as to Grounds four through nine, Grounds three
and ten are dismissed as moot, the petitioner’s amended petition is granted as to Grounds one and two, and
the death sentence is vacated.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED/SUGGESTED that a resentencing trial in State court occur within sixty (60)
days or as soon as practical thereafter.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge, presiding, accepting in part
the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, granting
in part and denying in part Respondents’ motion for summary judgment, and granting Petitioner’s amended
petition in part.
Date: March 20, 2019
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/L. Baker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?