Jackson v. Riley et al

Filing 29

JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (abuc)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Jeremy Tyrone Jackson, Plaintiff v. Warden Tim Riley; A/W Gary Lane; A/W Laura Cardwell; Major James Parrish; Captain Jonathan Nance; Sgt. Christopher Dillard; Lt. Moore, ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-03383-MGL Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) ($ recover from the defendant (name) ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of dollars %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, Jeremy Tyrone Jackson, shall take nothing of the defendants, Warden Tim Riley; A/W Gary Lane; A/W Laura Cardwell; Major James Parrish; Captain Jonathan Nance; Sgt. Christopher Dillard; Lt. Moore,, as to the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 and this action is dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with this court’s orders pursuant to Rule 41(b). This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Mary G. Lewis, United States District Judge, adopting the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which dismissed the case with prejudice. Date: July 18, 2014 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/A. Buckingham Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?