Griffin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 38

ORDER granting 35 Motion for Attorney Fees per Rule 406b, awarding fees in the amount of $5,303.25. Signed by Honorable Richard M. Gergel on 08/24/2016.(bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Steve Randall Griffin, Plaintiff, vs. Carolyn D. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-229-RMG ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for approval of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. No. 35). Plaintiff seeks approval of an attorney's fee for services on behalf of Plaintiff in federal court in the amount of $5,303.25, which, along with a previously granted fee by the Administrative Law Judge of $6,000 for services at the administrative level, represents 25% of the total back award obtained on behalf of Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 35-1at2). Plaintiff has provided the Court a copy of the attorney fee agreement with counsel, which provides for payment of an attorney's fee of 25% of the back award obtained. (Dkt, No. 35-2). The Defendant has advised the Court that she does not oppose the approval of Plaintiffs attorney fee under§ 406(b), but correctly notes that upon receipt of the fee award under§ 406(b), Plaintifrs counsel is obligated to pay to his client the amount previously awarded by the Court under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 36). The Court has reviewed the Plaintifr s motion in light of the standards set forth in Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). The Court finds that pursuant to the -1- Grisbrecht standards the proposed fee is reasonable and grants the Plaintiffs motion to approve the fee in the amount of $5,303.25. Upon receipt of this award, Plaintiffs counsel is directed to reimburse to Plaintiff$4,200.00 previously awarded under EAJA. (Dkt. No. 32). AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Richard Mark Gergel United States District Judge August 1L/, 2016 Charleston, South Carolina -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?