Allison v. Martin et al
Filing
28
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Marcus Daniel Allison,
Plaintiff
v.
Civil Action No.
Tom Martin, County of Oconee SC by Atty; Deputy
Sol David Wagner, Oconee Co; Chief PD Wilson
Burr, Oconee Co; Cpl. Jarrett Price, O.C.S.O.; Sgt.
Casey Bowling, O.C.S.O.; James Singleton, Ret.
Sheriff, O.C.S.O.; Elizabeth Holcomb, M.D. Lieber
Corr. Inst.; Jointly, Individually and in their Official
Capacities
1:14-cv-00668-RBH
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Marcus Daniel Allison, shall take nothing of the defendants; Tom Martin, Deputy Sol David
Wagner, Chief PD Wilson Burr, Cpl. Jarrett Price, Sgt. Casey Bowling, James Singleton, and Elizabeth Holcomb, from
the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Date: November 24, 2014
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?