Allison v. Martin et al

Filing 28

JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Marcus Daniel Allison, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. Tom Martin, County of Oconee SC by Atty; Deputy Sol David Wagner, Oconee Co; Chief PD Wilson Burr, Oconee Co; Cpl. Jarrett Price, O.C.S.O.; Sgt. Casey Bowling, O.C.S.O.; James Singleton, Ret. Sheriff, O.C.S.O.; Elizabeth Holcomb, M.D. Lieber Corr. Inst.; Jointly, Individually and in their Official Capacities 1:14-cv-00668-RBH ) ) ) ) ) Defendants JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ ), %, along with costs. ’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: the plaintiff, Marcus Daniel Allison, shall take nothing of the defendants; Tom Martin, Deputy Sol David Wagner, Chief PD Wilson Burr, Cpl. Jarrett Price, Sgt. Casey Bowling, James Singleton, and Elizabeth Holcomb, from the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without prejudice. This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Date: November 24, 2014 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/A. Buckingham Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?