Edmond v. John Doe I et al
JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (gmil)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
Civil Action No.
John Doe I; Robert Ward; John Doe II; John Doe III;
John Doe IV; John Doe V; Ann Hallman; Joseph
McFadden; James Blackwell; and Corporal Bouch,
each in his/her Individual-Personal capacity,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus post-judgment interest at the rate of
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
O other: the plaintiff, Jesse Edmond, shall take nothing of the defendants; John Doe I, Robert Ward, John Doe
II, John Doe III, John Doe IV, John Doe V, Ann Hallman, Joseph McFadden, James Blackwell, and Corporal Bouch,
from the complaint filed and this action is dismissed without prejudice and without service of process.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge, presiding, having adopted the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which dismissed the
complaint without prejudice.
Date: May 28, 2015
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?