Gilmore v. Gilmore et al
Filing
17
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc) (Main Document 17 replaced on 11/10/2014) (abuc, ).
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
James Bernard Curry,
Plaintiff
v.
The South Carolina Law Enforcement Div.; Chief
Mark A. Keel; Cpt. John T. Bishop, Investigative
Services,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
1:14-cv-04032-JFA
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
u the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
),
%, along with
costs.
u the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, James Bernard Curry, shall take nothing of the defendants; The South Carolina Law Enforcement
Div., Chief Mark A. Keel, and Cpt. John T. Bishop, from the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 and this
action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
u tried by a jury, the Honorable
u tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Date: November 10, 2014
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?