Gainey v. Cartledge et al

Filing 27

ORDER directing Petitioner to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Respondent's 19 MOTION for Summary Judgment by July 28, 2015. Petitioner is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V Hodges on 7/14/2015. (mwal)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA William Lee Gainey, Petitioner, vs. Warden Leroy Cartledge, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 1:14-4724-TMC-SVH ORDER Petitioner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brought this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion for summary judgment on April 22, 2015. [ECF No. 19]. As Petitioner is proceeding pro se, the court entered an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), on April 23, 2015, advising him of the importance of the motion for summary judgment and of the need for him to file an adequate response by May 29, 2015. [ECF No. 21]. Petitioner was specifically advised that if he failed to respond adequately, Respondent’s motion may be granted. On May 27, 2015, the undersigned extended Petitioner’s deadline, granting him until June 29, 2015, to respond to Respondent’s motion. [ECF No. 24]. Notwithstanding the specific warning and instructions set forth in the court’s Roseboro order, Petitioner has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that he does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action. Based on the foregoing, Petitioner is directed to advise the court whether he wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to Respondent’s motion for summary judgment by July 28, 2015. Petitioner is further advised that if he fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. July 14, 2015 Columbia, South Carolina Shiva V. Hodges United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?