Womble v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 15

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting the 11 Report and Recommendation, reversing the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remanding the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/6/2016. (cwil, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Myra Michelle Womble, Plaintiff, vs. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.1 :15-3017-RMG ORDER This matter comes before the Court for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial handling. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") on March 22, 2016, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded to the agency. (Dkt. No. 11). The Magistrate Judge's recommendation is based on the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ") failure to properly weigh and address the Plaintiff's 100% VA disability determination. The Commissioner has filed a reply to the R & R indicating that she does not intend to file any objections to the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. No. 13). The Court has reviewed the R & R and the record evidence and finds that the Magistrate Judge has ably addressed the factual and legal issues in this matter and correctly concluded that the decision of the Commissioner should be reversed and remanded. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as the order of this Court (Dkt.. No. 11), -1­ REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and REMANDS the matter to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this order. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Judge Charleston, South Carolina May G, 2016 -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?