Jones v. Stirling et al
AMENDED JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of South Carolina
John H. Jones,
Bryan Stirling, SCDC Director; Neana Staley,
Warden-Manning C.I.; Mr. Maples, Food Service
Civil Action No.
AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
O The plaintiff, John H. Jones, shall take nothing of the defendants, Bryan Stirling, Neana Staley, Mr. Maples, and this
action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Date: October 2, 2015
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?