Castillo v. Jacobs et al
ORDER dismissing 1 Complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/2/2016. (mwal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Roqelio Ramirez Castillo, # 1120237,
Dr. T. Jacobs and Dr. Berry Weissglass,
C/A No.: 1:15-4976-CMC
Roqelio Ramirez Castillo (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this
action while being detained at Charleston County Detention Center. On January 7, 2016, the
court ordered Plaintiff to provide the service documents necessary to advance his case. [ECF No.
7]. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to provide the necessary information within a specific
time period would subject the case to dismissal. Id. Plaintiff partially responded to the court’s
order, however, he did not properly complete his service documents. The court filed a second
order on February 1, 2016, asking Plaintiff to provide the service documents necessary to
advance his case. [ECF No. 9]. Plaintiff was warned that failure to provide the necessary
information within a specific time period would subject the case to dismissal. Id. The time for
response expired on February 25, 2016, and Plaintiff did not file a response. As Plaintiff has
failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court, the case is
dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See
Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Cameron McGowan Currie
CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE
Senior United States District Judge
Columbia, South Carolina
March 2, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?