Coakley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Remand, reversing the decision of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remanding the action for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 10/13/2016.(bshr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Michelle L. Coakley,
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
C/A No.: 1:16-695-DCN-SVH
Defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration (“Commissioner”), by her attorneys, Beth Drake, Acting United States
Attorney, and Marshall Prince, Assistant United States Attorney for the District of South
Carolina, has moved this court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with
an order of reversal with remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further
administrative proceedings. [ECF No. 12]. The movant represents that Plaintiff’s counsel,
David Anthony Bornhorst, consents to the motion. Id.
By order of the court, this case is remanded to the Appeals Council. The Appeals
Council will direct the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to further evaluate the record
regarding Plaintiff’s mental functional limitations.
Pursuant to the power of this court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or
reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for
remand of this action for further proceedings, this court hereby reverses the
Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the
cause to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings as set out above. See
Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a
separate judgment pursuant to the Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 13, 2016
Columbia, South Carolina
Shiva V. Hodges
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?