Ford v. Warden
ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendation; granting Respondent's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing petition with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/27/2017. (mwal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Q@M~fD
DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Glenn Ford, #04010-000,
Warden, FCI Edgefield,
21 P 12: 28
ORDER AND OPINION
Glenn Ford ("Petitioner"), proceeding pro se, filed this action on May 12,2016. (Dkt. No.1.)
Petitioner seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the 2001 decision of the
United States Parole Commission ("USPC") to rescind his parole. This matter is before the Court
on the Report and Recommendation ("R. & R") of the Magistrate Judge to grant Respondent's
motion for summary judgment and deny the habeas petition. (Dkt. No. 24.)
No objections to the R & R have been filed. While this Court will conduct a de novo review
of any portion of the R & R to which a specific objection is made, it appears Congress did not
intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the Magistrate absent
objection by any party. 28 U.S.c. § 636(b)(1); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).
This Court's review of the record indicates that the R & R accurately analyzes the facts of
this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, this Court adopts the Magistrate's R & R as the
Order of this Court. Respondent's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the habeas
petition is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
Richard Mark Ge el
United States District Court Judge
February 27, 2017
Charleston, South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?