In Re: Riley et al
Filing
54
ORDER granting 53 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 4/4/2017.(asni, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
AIKEN DIVISION
Transamerica Premier Life Insurance
Company,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Mary S. Riley, Cathy A. Sherlock, and
Rowland Funeral Home, Inc.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:16-01850-JMC
CONSENT ORDER FOR
INTERPLEADER
BEFORE THE COURT is the request of Plaintiff Transamerica Premier Life Insurance
Company (“Transamerica”), with the consent of Defendant Mary S. Riley (“Riley”) and Defendant
Cathy A. Sherlock (“Sherlock”), to allow the disbursement of the proceeds of the subject life
insurance policy and to discharge Transamerica from further liability relating to the policy
pursuant to Rule 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
THE RECORD REFLECTS the following facts pertinent to the Order requested by
Transamerica:
1.
Transamerica is an insurance company organized and existing under the laws of the
state of Iowa and maintains its principal place of business in Iowa.
2.
Riley is a citizen of South Carolina, residing in the town of North Augusta located
in Aiken County, South Carolina.
3.
Sherlock is a citizen of the state of South Carolina, residing in the town of North
August located in Aiken County, South Carolina.
4.
Rowland Funeral Home, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the state
of South Carolina and having its principal place of business in North Augusta, South Carolina,
located in Aiken County.
5.
In 2011, Transamerica issued policy number xxxxx5644, a life insurance policy
insuring the life of Roseann Sherlock (the “Policy”), with a face value of $600,000.
6.
The application for the Policy designated Roseann Sherlock as the owner and Mary
S. Riley as the primary beneficiary.
7.
Transamerica received a policy change form dated September 20, 2011 purportedly
bearing the signature of Roseann Sherlock and naming Mary S. Riley as the owner of the Policy.
8.
Transamerica received a policy change form dated February 10, 2014 purportedly
bearing the signature of Roseann Sherlock naming Cathy A. Sherlock as the new owner and
primary beneficiary.
9.
Roseann Sherlock died on February 2, 2016, in Aiken County, South Carolina.
10.
Transamerica received a claim form dated February 10, 2016 signed by Mary S.
11.
Transamerica also received a claim form dated February 24, 2016 signed by Cathy
Riley.
A. Sherlock.
12.
Transamerica also received an assignment of death benefit proceeds in the amount
of $18,964.95 with the assignee being Rowland Funeral Home, Inc.
13.
The death benefit due under the Policy is $600,000.00.
14.
On June 7, 2016, Transamerica instituted this interpleader action because it was in
doubt as to which Defendant is entitled to payment of the proceeds under the Policy due to the
competing claims, and Transamerica is or may be exposed to multiple or inconsistent liability and
obligations under the Policy as a result.
2
15.
Riley was served with process on June 23, 2016 and an Affidavit of Service was
filed with the Court on July 6, 2016.
16.
Sherlock was served with process on June 23, 2016 and an Affidavit of Service was
filed with the Court on July 6, 2016.
17.
Riley and Sherlock have appeared and answered in the instant lawsuit and have
agreed to the Court’s exercise of in personam jurisdiction.
18.
Rowland Funeral home was served with the Summons and Complaint on June 21,
2016, and its answer was due on July 12, 2016. Rowland Funeral Home did not answer or appear.
The clerk entered default against Rowland Funeral Home on August 2, 2016 [Dkt No. 15].
19.
Riley and Sherlock jointly request the payment of EIGHTEEN THOUSAND NINE
HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR AND 95/100S ($18,964.95) DOLLARS of the disputed funds to
Rowland Funeral Home for services rendered by Rowland Funeral Home and funds advanced to
allow the purchase of a cemetery lot and other cemetery expenses. Transamerica has no objection
to this request. An assignment form was submitted with the Complaint for Interpleader as Exhibit
F and provides that the funeral home is to receive from the death benefit proceeds the sum of
EIGHTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR AND 95/100S ($18,964.95)
DOLLARS.
20.
Riley and Sherlock consent to an award of attorneys’ fees for Transamerica in the
amount of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND AND NO/100S ($17,000.00) DOLLARS for the efforts
of its counsel in commencing and litigating this interpleader action.
21.
Riley and Sherlock have reached an agreement as to the division of the remaining
death benefit proceeds. They seek to have the remaining death benefit proceeds divided equally
between them and, therefore, request that the sum of TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-TWO
THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND 53/100S ($282,017.53) DOLLARS be distributed to Riley and
3
that TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND 52/100S ($282,017.52)
DOLLARS be distributed to Sherlock.
THE COURT HEREBY FINDS that it has jurisdiction over both the subject matter and the
parties. The Court has subject matter over claims related to the Policy pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332 because there is complete diversity of citizenship between Transamerica and Defendants
and because the amount in controversy exceeds the sum of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
The Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants because they are South Carolina residents
who were personally served with process and because none of them have challenged the Court’s
exercise of personal jurisdiction.
THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that multiple parties claim an interest in the same
insurance proceeds and that it would be appropriate to allow such proceeds to be disbursed as
outlined above and to discharge Transamerica of all liability and obligations under the Policy. The
Court further finds that all parties with a potential interest in the insurance proceeds have been
named and properly served with a copy of the Complaint for Interpleader.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Court hereby orders the following:
1.
Default judgment is hereby entered against Rowland Funeral Home providing for
the relief sought in the Complaint for Interpleader.
2.
Transamerica shall disburse to Rowland Funeral Home within fifteen (15) days of
the entry of this Order the sum of EIGHTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SIXTY-FOUR
AND 95/100S ($18,964.95) DOLLARS.
3.
Transamerica shall distribute to Riley in accordance with the instructions of her
counsel the sum of TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND 53/100S
($282,017.53) DOLLARS. This distribution shall occur within fifteen (15) days of the later of (a)
4
the entry of this Order, or (b) the receipt by Transamerica of a properly executed W-9 form for
each payee designated by counsel for Riley for this distribution.
4.
Transamerica shall distribute to Sherlock in accordance with the instructions of her
counsel the sum of TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-TWO THOUSAND SEVENTEEN AND 52/100S
($282,017.52) DOLLARS. This distribution shall occur within fifteen (15) days of the later of (a)
the entry of this Order, or (b) the receipt by Transamerica of a properly executed W-9 form for
each payee designated by counsel for Sherlock for this distribution.
5.
Transamerica is permitted to retain the remaining SEVENTEEN THOUSAND
AND NO/100S ($17,000.00) DOLLARS of the death benefit proceeds representing an award to
Transamerica for its attorneys’ fees and costs.
6.
Transamerica is hereby discharged from any further liability or obligation under
Policy No. xxxxx5644 covering the life of Roseann Sherlock, including any and all riders thereto.
7.
Each Defendant is enjoined and restrained from instituting any action against
Transamerica for recovery of any proceeds related to Policy No. xxxxx5644 covering the life of
Roseann Sherlock.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/J. Michelle Childs
J. Michelle Childs
United States District Judge
Dated: April 4, 2017
Columbia, South Carolina
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?