Burkes v. McFadden

Filing 13

ORDER dismissing the case without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/9/2016. (bgoo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Christopher Lovett Burkes, #272240, Petitioner, vs. Warden Joseph McFadden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C/A No.: 1:16-2532-BHH ORDER Christopher Lovett Burkes (“Petitioner”), an inmate housed at Lieber Correctional Institution, proceeding pro se, brought this action seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 15, 2016, the Court ordered Petitioner to pay the five dollar ($5) filing fee for a habeas corpus action or complete and return the attached Form AO 240 (application to proceed in forma pauperis). (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner was warned that failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period would subject the case to dismissal. Id. Petitioner failed to respond. On August 12, 2016, the Court sent a second order asking Petitioner to pay the five dollar ($5) filing fee for a habeas corpus action or complete and return the attached Form AO 240. (ECF No. 10.) Petitioner was again warned that failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period would subject the case to dismissal. Id. The time for a response expired on September 6, 2016, and Petitioner did not respond. As Petitioner has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this Court, the case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Bruce Howe Hendricks Bruce Howe Hendricks United States District Judge September 9, 2016 Greenville, South Carolina   NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within the time period set forth under Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?