Altman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 20

ORDER granting 16 MOTION for Attorney Fees pursuant to EAJA, awarding $2,776.29 in attorney's fees and $400.00 in expenses. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 05/25/2017.(bshr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION STEVEN DOUGLAS ALTMAN, Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-2959-MGL ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) filed on May 22, 2017. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Plaintiff requests an award of $2,756.25 in attorney’s fees and $420.04 in expenses. Defendant does not object to Plaintiff’s request for a total award of $3.176.29, with $2,776.29 in attorney’s fees and $400.00 in expenses.1 In accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595-98 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the litigant, thus subjecting EAJA fees to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. ' 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)), and, therefore, this Court directs fees be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. Accordingly, 1 Defendant notes Plaintiff seeks $20.04 for certified mailing fees as “costs,” but certified mailing fees are a form of postage and are considered “expenses” under the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(2)(A), 2412(d)(2)(4). Plaintiff’s request for certified mailing fees will therefore be included in the amount of attorney’s fees awarded rather than expenses. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion under the EAJA is granted in the amount of $2,776.29 in attorney’s fees and $400.00 in expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Mary Geiger Lewis MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: May 25, 2017 Columbia, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?