Duren v. McFadden et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)

AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina

David A. Duren, A human being under protest UCC
1-308/3-305(1)(A) iii
Plaintiff

v.
Joseph McFadden, Warden Lieber C.I.; Daniel
Gourley, Asst. Attorney General,

)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action No.

1:16-cv-03002-MBS

Defendants

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
the amount of
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
costs.

dollars ($ ),
%, along with

’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, David A. Duren, shall take nothing of the defendants, Joseph McFadden and Daniel Gourley, and
this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b).
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Margaret B. Seymour, Senior United States District Judge, adopting the Report and Recommendation
set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended the dismissal of this
action without prejudice.

Date: January 19, 2017

ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/M. Walker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk