Matthews v. Magill et al
Filing
16
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Mitchell Shane Matthews,
Plaintiff
v.
Civil Action No.
Mr. John Magill, Director; Ms. Versie J. Bellamy,
Deputy Director; Ms. Holley Scaturo, Program
Director; Ms. Cynthia Helff, Program Director; Ms.
Kimberly Poholchuk, Program Coordinator; Ms.
Shela Lindsay, Resident Advisor; PSO Sgt. Gunther,
and any other known or unknown actors of the state
whom are involved, in their personal and
professional capacity,
1:16-cv-03362-BHH
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
recover from the defendant (name)
the amount of
’ the plaintiff (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
costs.
dollars ($ ),
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O The plaintiff, Mitchell Shane Matthews, shall take nothing of the defendants, Mr. John Magill; Ms. Versie J.
Bellamy; Ms. Holley Scaturo; Ms. Cynthia Helff; Ms. Kimberly Poholchuk; Ms. Shela Lindsay; PSO Sgt. Gunther, and
this action is dismissed without prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
dismissing the complaint without prejudice.
Date: December 9, 2016
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/M. Walker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?