Murray v. Rice et al
Filing
55
JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice as to federal claims and without prejudice as to state claims. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Bryantavious Murray,
Plaintiff
v.
Civil Action No.
Geoffrey Rice, Rank Lt.; Jeremey McCary, Rank
Sgt.; Ronald Cook, Rank Lt.; James Thompkins,
Rank Lt., each being sued in their individual
capacity,
1:17-cv-00220-RBH
)
)
)
)
)
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
recover from the defendant (name)
the amount of
’ the plaintiff (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
costs.
dollars ($ ),
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O The plaintiff, Bryantavious Murray, shall take nothing of the defendants, Geoffrey Rice; Jeremey McCary; Ronald
Cook; James Tompkins, and this action is dismissed with prejudice as to the Plaintiff’s federal claims and without
prejudice as to Plaintiff’s state claims.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report and
Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended
granting Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss action.
Date: July 12, 2017
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/M. Walker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?