Hall v. Cartiledge et al
Filing
41
JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Skyler Hall,
Plaintiff
v.
Leroy Cartiledge; Frank Musier; Allison
Glidewell;J. Stevens, Major of Security, Black
Male; Ms. Jennings; Ms. Green; Warden
Eagleton,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
1:17-cv-00729-DCC
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
recover from the defendant (name)
the amount of
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
costs.
dollars ($ ),
%, along with
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Skyler Hall, shall take nothing of the defendants, Leroy Cartiledge; Frank Musier; Allison
Glidewell;J. Stevens, Major of Security, Black Male; Ms. Jennings; Ms. Green; Warden Eagleton, and this
action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b).
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Donald C. Coggins, Jr., United States District Judge, adopting the Report and Recommendation set
forth by the Honorable Shiva V. Hodges, United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended the dismissal of this
action with prejudice.
Date: January 2, 2018
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/M. Walker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?