Wilson v. Hood

Filing 14

JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Christopher Darnell Wilson, Petitioner v. Judge Robert E. Hood, et all in expanded cases; Warden McFadden Respondent ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-01468-HMH-SVH JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ’ the petitioner (name) recover from the respondent (name) which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of the amount of %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of dollars ($ %, along with costs. ’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name) recover costs from the petitioner (name) . O other: the petitioner, Christopher Darnell Wilson, shall take nothing of the respondent, Judge Robert E. Hood; Warden McFadden, and this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). This action was (check one): ’ tried by a jury, the Honorable ’ tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr., United States District Judge, presiding. Date: August 16, 2017 ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT s/M. Walker Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk ),

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?