Wilson v. Hood
Filing
14
JUDGMENT dismissing case without prejudice. (mwal)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Christopher Darnell Wilson,
Petitioner
v.
Judge Robert E. Hood, et all in expanded cases;
Warden McFadden
Respondent
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
1:17-cv-01468-HMH-SVH
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the petitioner (name)
recover from the respondent (name)
which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
dollars ($
%, along with
costs.
’ the petitioner recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the respondent (name)
recover costs from the petitioner (name)
.
O other: the petitioner, Christopher Darnell Wilson, shall take nothing of the respondent, Judge Robert E. Hood;
Warden McFadden, and this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b).
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable Henry M. Herlong, Jr., United States District Judge, presiding.
Date: August 16, 2017
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/M. Walker
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
),
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?