Glenn v. Coffey et al

Filing 12

ORDER dismissing case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 9/12/2017. (mwal)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Andres L. Glenn, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-1768-CMC Plaintiff, vs. ORDER Felehia Coffey; James Cocran; Benchers Early; Veronica Jones; Sheila Jones; Comnelean Jones; Aineze Jones; Bernard Jones Gilmore; and Alberta Jones R. Gilmore, Defendants. Andres L. Glenn (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action while being detained at Correct Care. On July 20, 2017, the court ordered Plaintiff to pay the $350 filing fee or complete the enclosed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Form AO 240) and to provide the service documents necessary to advance his case. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period may subject the case to dismissal. Id. Plaintiff did not file a response. The court issued a second order on August 15, 2017, ordering Plaintiff to pay the $350 filing fee or complete the enclosed Form AO 240 and to provide the service documents necessary to advance his case. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was again warned that the failure to provide the necessary information within a specific time period may subject the case to dismissal. Id. The time for response expired on September 5, 2017, and Plaintiff did not file a response. As Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this case and has failed to comply with an order of this court, the case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Cameron McGowan Currie CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE Senior United States District Judge Columbia, South Carolina September 12, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?