Williams v. South Carolina

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommendation. It is Ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Judge R Bryan Harwell on 3/21/2006.(gnan, )

Download PDF
Williams v. South Carolina Doc. 6 2:06-cv-00450-RBH Date Filed 03/21/2006 Entry Number 6 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Ronnie Williams, Plaintiff, vs. ) South Carolina, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ___________________________________ ) This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Carr, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). The Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). 1 ) ) ) ) C.A. No.: 2:06-450-RBH ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 2:06-cv-00450-RBH Date Filed 03/21/2006 Entry Number 6 Page 2 of 2 After a thorough review of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Carr's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/ R. Bryan Harwell R. Bryan Harwell United States District Judge Florence, South Carolina March 21, 2006 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?