Brown et al
Filing
206
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 180 Motion to Dismiss Signed by Chief Judge David C Norton on 11/2/10.(kozi, )
-BM Brown et al v Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Doc. 206
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ) Richard Brown, Louis C. Mancuso, and ) Robert J. Brinson, individually and on ) behalf of all persons similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., ) ) Defendant/ ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Robert B. Pearlman, and Pearlman & ) Pearlman, Attorneys at Law, P.C., ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ______________________________________ )
Civil No. 2:07-CV-3852-DCN
ORDER
This matter is before the court on third-party defendants' motion to dismiss defendant's/third-party plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against defendant/third-party plaintiff Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. ("Schwab"), alleging that Schwab violated the South Carolina Uniform Securities Act through its dealings with Albert E. Parish ("Parish"). Schwab, in turn, filed a third-party complaint against third-party defendants Robert B. Pearlman and his law firm, asserting the following causes of action: (1) indemnification, (2) contribution, (3) professional malpractice, (4) negligent misrepresentation, (5) deceit, and (6) negligence. 1
Dockets.Justia.com
Having thoroughly considered the parties' written and oral submissions in light of the standard set forth in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009), the court GRANTS third-party defendants' motion to dismiss Schwab's professional malpractice claim, without prejudice, as a result of Schwab's failure to contemporaneously file an affidavit of an expert witness with its complaint as required by South Carolina Code of Laws § 1536-100(B). The court DENIES third-party defendants' motion to dismiss as to all remaining claims. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________________ DAVID C. NORTON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE November 2, 2010 Charleston, South Carolina
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?