Dudley et al v. Indymac Bank FSB et al

Filing 65

ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 48 Motion to Dismiss. It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 3/15/2010. (prou, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA FLORENCE DIVISION Mark Dudley and Robert Jolly, Plaintiffs, vs. Indymac Bank, FSB; Rogers, Townsend & Thomas, PC; Special Referee Georgetown County, Joe M. Crosby; and Others as they become known; Defendants. ___________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.: 2:08-cv-3658-TLW-TER ORDER Plaintiffs Mark Dudley and Robert Jolly, (Aplaintiffs@) brought this civil action, pro se, on November 3, 2008. (Doc. # 1). This matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Athe Report@) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III, to whom this case had previously been assigned. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Motion to Dismiss be granted and the case be dismissed with prejudice as to FDIC as Receiver for IndyMac Bank. (Doc. # 61). The plaintiffs filed no objections to the report. Objections were due on February 16, 2010. This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report. 28 U.S.C. ' 636. In the absence of objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge=s Report. For the reasons articulated by the Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge=s Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. (Doc. # 61). IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Terry L. Wooten United States District Judge March 15, 2010 Florence, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?