craigslist Inc v. McMaster et al

Filing 19

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Trey Gowdy, III, Jerry W Peace, Scarlet Wilson, Christina T Adams, Donald V Myers, Edgar L Clements, III, Robert M Ariall, I McDuffie Stone, III, Gregory Hembree, Kevin S Brackett, Henry D McMaster, David Pascoe, Barbara R Morgan, C Kelly Jackson, Jay E Hodge, Jr, W Barney Giese, Douglas A Barfield, Jr. Response to Motion due by 9/8/2009 No proposed order(Smith, James)

Download PDF
craigslist Inc v. McMaster et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION craigslist, Inc. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Henry D. McMaster, in his official ) capacity as the Attorney General ) of the State of South Carolina; David ) Pascoe; Barbara R. Morgan; C. Kelly ) Jackson; Jay E. Hodge, Jr.; W. Barney ) Giese; Douglas A. Barfield, Jr.; Trey ) Gowdy, III; Jerry W. Peace; Scarlett ) Wilson; Christina T. Adams; Donald V. ) Myers; Edgar L. Clements, III; Robert M. ) Ariail; I. McDuffie Stone, III; Gregory ) Hembree; and Kevin S. Brackett, in their ) official capacities as South Carolina Circuit ) Solicitors, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-01308-CWH MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME OF DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND SOLICITORS The Defendants Attorney General and the sixteen Circuit Solicitors1 hereby move for an enlargement of time to file their Reply to Plaintiff's Return to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. In compliance with Local Rule 6.01, DSC, the Defendants note the following: 1. The current deadline for filing the Reply brief would be five days after the filing of Plaintiff's Return to the Motion to Dismiss with additional days for intervening weekends and holidays under Rule 6, FRCP. The current deadline for Plaintiff's J. Strom Thurmond was elected as Solicitor for the Second Judicial Circuit upon the retirement of Barbara Morgan, and William B. Rogers, Jr., was elected as Solicitor for the Fourth Judicial Circuit upon the retirement of Jay E. Hodge, Jr. 1 Dockets.Justia.com Return is August 31, 2009, and Plaintiff's counsel has informed counsel for Defendants that he does not anticipate requesting an enlargement of time for that deadline. Therefore, the Defendants' Reply would be due on September 8, 2009, if the Return is filed on the 31st. 2. The Reply deadline has not been previously extended, but the Court previously extended the time for Defendants to file their Motion to Dismiss and for Plaintiff to file its Return. 3. The number of additional days requested are six days. The proposed date for the filing of the Defendants' Reply is September 14, 2009. 4. This extension would not affect other deadlines because no scheduling order has been issued. 5. This time will be needed to adequately address this case because of the intervention of the Labor Day weekend and the schedules of counsel for the Defendants. Knowing in advance whether the enlargement of time will be granted will assist counsel for Defendants with planning. 6. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.02, DSC, the undersigned has consulted with Plaintiff's counsel and that attorney does not oppose this motion. 7. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.04, DSC, no memorandum is filed herewith as this motion is self-explanatory. 2 Therefore, the Defendants respectfully request that their request for enlargement of time be granted so that they may file their Reply on September 14, 2009. Respectfully submitted, HENRY D. McMASTER Attorney General Federal Bar No. 2887 ROBERT D. COOK Assistant Deputy Attorney General Federal Bar No. 285 Email: AGRCOOK@SCAG.GOV /s/ J. Emory Smith, Jr. J. EMORY SMITH, JR. Assistant Deputy Attorney General Federal Bar No. 3908 Email: AGESMITH@SCAG.GOV DEBORAH R.J. SHUPE Assistant Attorney General Federal Bar No. 3835 Email: DSHUPE@SCAG.GOV Post Office Box 11549 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 Phone: (803) 734-3680 Fax: (803) 734-3677 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND SOLICITORS August 21, 2009 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?