Donnelly et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
Filing
51
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER transferring case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the District of South Carolina. Signed by MDL Panel on 10/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Suggestion of Remand, # 2 Cover Letter and Envelope)(alan, )
RECEIVED CLERK'S OFfiCE.
2012 OCT 11: A '1: 14
DISTRICT COURT
GISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLlN\
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL
Si1ARLESTON. SC
!
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
;2 " 10- 14cA
IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION (NO. VI)
MDLNo.875
(SEE ATT ACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER
The transferee court in this litigation has, in the actions on this conditional remand order: (1) severed
all claims for punitive or exemplary damages; and (2) advised the Panel that coordinated or
consolidated pretrial proceedings with respect to the remaining claims have been completed and that
remand to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.c. § 1407(a), is appropriate.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims in the action(s) on this conditional remand order
except the severed damages claims be remanded to its/their respective transferor court(s).
IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal ofthis order to the transferee clerk for filing
shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with the
Clerk of the Panel within this 7- day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the
Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record
to be remanded and all necessary copies of any pleadings or other matter filed so as to enable said
Clerk to comply with the order of remand. .
.
FOR THE PANEL:
Inasmuch as no objection is
pending at this time, the
stay is lifted.
Oct 10, 2012
CLERK'S OFFICE
UNITED STATES
JUOICtAL PANEL ON
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
g#'
" 1
Je ffiery N . L ut h·~ .
Clerk of the Panel
'~./~
, ,I....
!
IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION (NO. VI)
MDLNo.875
SCHEDULE FOR CRO
TRANSFEREE
rus:r lllYa C.A.NO.
TRANSFEROR
D.lS.I JllY,. C.A.NO.
PAE
2
11-67226
CAN
3
11-02775
PAE
2
11-67272
CAN
3
11-03508
PAE
2
11-67273
CAN
3
11-03564
PAE
2
11-67662
CAN
3
11-04120
PAE
2
11-67667
CAN
3
11-04327
PAE
PAE
PAE
PAE
PA:E
PAE
2
2
2
2
CAN
CAN
CAN
GAS
tA:M
ND
3
4
4
5
2
11-67698
11-67330
11-67332
09-74337
10 68064
09-66629
11-04444
11-03772
11-03802
91-00200
10 00164
90-00248
PAE
2
10-68650
NYS
... PAE
2
09-92628
GAN
1
94....00120
PAE
2
10-83258
SC
2
10-01409
PAE
2
09-69122
UT
2
06-00741
~
3-
1
99-11633
... - denotes that the civil action has been severed.
CASE CAPTION
DODGE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY
JOHNS et at v. GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY et at
GILPIN et at v. GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY et al
DELANCY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC
COMPANY et al
DENNIS v. BATH IRON WORKS
CORPORATION et al
KING v. FOSTER WHEELERLLC .
HUFF et al v. CBS CORPORATION et at
BARNES v. FOSTER WHEELER LLC et at
COURSON et at v. GARLOCK, INC. et al
COPOLYMM¥r\8J:
ARDOIN y. D8M
012
~ et a1
EWINE v. A.H. BENNETT CO
RILEY et at v. A.C. AND S.,
INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING
&SUPPLY) et al
CARTER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
DONNELLYet at v. AW CHESTERTON
COMPANY et at
ANDERSON et at v. FORD MOTOR
COMPANY et at
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?