Donnelly et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al

Filing 51

CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER transferring case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the District of South Carolina. Signed by MDL Panel on 10/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Suggestion of Remand, # 2 Cover Letter and Envelope)(alan, )

Download PDF
RECEIVED CLERK'S OFfiCE. 2012 OCT 11: A '1: 14 DISTRICT COURT GISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLlN\ UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL Si1ARLESTON. SC ! on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ;2 " 10- 14cA IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI) MDLNo.875 (SEE ATT ACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL REMAND ORDER The transferee court in this litigation has, in the actions on this conditional remand order: (1) severed all claims for punitive or exemplary damages; and (2) advised the Panel that coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with respect to the remaining claims have been completed and that remand to the transferor court(s), as provided in 28 U.S.c. § 1407(a), is appropriate. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims in the action(s) on this conditional remand order except the severed damages claims be remanded to its/their respective transferor court(s). IT IS ALSO ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.2 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the transmittal ofthis order to the transferee clerk for filing shall be stayed 7 days from the date of this order. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7- day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the office of the Clerk for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 10.4(a), the parties shall furnish the Clerk for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania with a stipulation or designation of the contents of the record to be remanded and all necessary copies of any pleadings or other matter filed so as to enable said Clerk to comply with the order of remand. . . FOR THE PANEL: Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Oct 10, 2012 CLERK'S OFFICE UNITED STATES JUOICtAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION g#' " 1 Je ffiery N . L ut h·~ . Clerk of the Panel '~./~ , ,I.... ! IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. VI) MDLNo.875 SCHEDULE FOR CRO TRANSFEREE rus:r lllYa C.A.NO. TRANSFEROR D.lS.I JllY,. C.A.NO. PAE 2 11-67226 CAN 3 11-02775 PAE 2 11-67272 CAN 3 11-03508 PAE 2 11-67273 CAN 3 11-03564 PAE 2 11-67662 CAN 3 11-04120 PAE 2 11-67667 CAN 3 11-04327 PAE PAE PAE PAE PA:E PAE 2 2 2 2 CAN CAN CAN GAS tA:M ND 3 4 4 5 2 11-67698 11-67330 11-67332 09-74337 10 68064 09-66629 11-04444 11-03772 11-03802 91-00200 10 00164 90-00248 PAE 2 10-68650 NYS ... PAE 2 09-92628 GAN 1 94....00120 PAE 2 10-83258 SC 2 10-01409 PAE 2 09-69122 UT 2 06-00741 ~ 3- 1 99-11633 ... - denotes that the civil action has been severed. CASE CAPTION DODGE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY JOHNS et at v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et at GILPIN et at v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al DELANCY v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al DENNIS v. BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION et al KING v. FOSTER WHEELERLLC . HUFF et al v. CBS CORPORATION et at BARNES v. FOSTER WHEELER LLC et at COURSON et at v. GARLOCK, INC. et al COPOLYMM¥r\8J: ARDOIN y. D8M 012 ~ et a1 EWINE v. A.H. BENNETT CO RILEY et at v. A.C. AND S., INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY) et al CARTER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. DONNELLYet at v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et at ANDERSON et at v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et at

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?