Brice v. Ozmint et al

Filing 54

JUDGMENT: The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks is adopted and incorporated. This case is dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. The plaintiff shall take nothing on his compliant filed pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (hhil, ) (Main Document 54 replaced on 3/21/2011 to correct document) (hhil, ).

Download PDF
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the District of South Carolina Michael J. Brice, Plaintiff v. Jon Ozmint; Mark Sanford; Warden Pate; Major Newton; Ms. Singleton; Capt. Smith, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:10-1552-MBS-BHH JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): ' the plaintiff (name) recover from the defendant (name) the amount of dollars ($ ), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of costs. %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of %, along with ' the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . O other: The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks is adopted and incorporated. This case is dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution. The plaintiff shall take nothing on his compliant filed pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was (check one): ' tried by a jury, the Honorable ' tried by the Honorable presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached. O decided by the Honorable Richard M. Gergel, United States District Judge. Date: March 21, 2011 CLERK OF COURT S/H. Hillman Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?