Demorcy v. Bernard et al

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Plaintiff failed to respond to Court's Proper Form Order. Signed by Honorable Joseph F Anderson, Jr on 11/22/10. (hhil, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Jamel Alexander Demorcy, #270803, P l a in t i f f , vs. Warden McKie Bernard; Lt/Capteen W. Davis; Investigator Smith T; Classification Ms. Loften; Mental Health Williams; Social Warden T. Smith; Director John Ozmint; Gisell Demorcy Mother; Nicole Gibbs, D e f e n d a n t( s) . ) C/A No.: 2:10-2078-JFA-RSC ) ) ) ) ) Order ) ) ) ) ) ) _______________________________________ This matter is before the court because of the plaintiff's failure to respond to the Court's order entered on September 22, 2010. A review of the record indicates that the Magistrate Judge ordered the plaintiff to submit items needed to render the above-captioned case into proper form within twenty-one days, plus three days for mail time, and that if he failed to do so, his case would be dismissed without prejudice. The Magistrate Judge's order was sent to the last known address of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has failed to provide the Court with the necessary documents and his time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the above-captioned case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. 1 The Clerk of Court shall close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. November 22, 2010 Columbia, South Carolina Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. United States District Judge See General Order, In Re: Procedures in Civil Actions Filed by Prisoner Pro Se Litigants, 3:07mc-5014-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2007) (dismissal without prejudice does not count as a "strike" for purposes of the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). If the plaintiff wishes to bring this action in the future, he should obtain new forms for doing so from the Clerk's Office. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?