Dixon v. Rivera
Filing
18
ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Carr. This petition is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Honorable Terry L Wooten on 4/8/11.(hhil, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
FLORENCE DIVISION
Larry L. Dixon, # 06402-017,
a/k/a Larry LaVerne Dixon,
)
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Mildred Rivera, Warden F.C.I. Estill,
)
)
Respondent.
)
____________________________________)
Civil Action No.: 2:10-cv-2380-TLW-RSC
ORDER
On September 13, 2010, the petitioner, Larry L. Dixon (“petitioner”), proceeding pro se, filed
this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. #1). The case was
referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert S. Carr pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2), DSC.
This matter now comes before this Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (“the
Report”) filed by the Magistrate Judge to whom this case had previously been assigned. (Doc. # 10).
On December 8, 2010, the Magistrate Judge signed the Report. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge
recommends the petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition be dismissed without prejudice because the
petitioner has not exhausted administrative remedies and has not shown that a second or successive
28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective. (Doc. # 10). The petitioner filed a
response to the Report in which he submits he has not exhausted administrative remedies and has
not sought permission to file a second or successive Section 2255 motion. (Doc. # 12). The
1
petitioner, therefore, requests that this Court dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice
so he may pursue administrative remedies or a successive Section 2255 motion. (Doc. # 12).
The petitioner’s request to dismiss his Section 2241 petition without prejudice (Doc. # 12)
is GRANTED. The petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition (Doc. # 1) is hereby DISMISSED
without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Terry L. Wooten
United States District Judge
April 8, 2011
Florence, South Carolina
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?