United States of America v. 15000 dollars in United States Currency
Filing
11
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 1/30/2012.(alan, )
`IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
$15,000 IN
CURRENCY,
UNITED
STATES
Defendant In Rem.
) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:11-3196-PMD
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER GRANTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
AND GRANTING JUDGMENT AND FINAL DECREE OF FORFEITURE
This in rem forfeiture action was initiated through a complaint for forfeiture in rem
filed by the United States on November 22, 2011. It concerns $15,000 in United States
currency (the “Defendant Currency”), which was seized on September 1, 2011, by the
United States Secret Service. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that the Defendant
Currency constitutes or is traceable to proceeds involved in trafficking of illegal drugs, or
that the Defendant Currency was used or intended to be used to facilitate such offenses;
and, that the Defendant Currency is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6),
and 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(A) and 981(a)(1)(C).
Based upon matters of record in this case, it appears that the notice of forfeiture
and complaint were served upon the known potential claimants, Roger Ray Crumblin, Jr.,
and Diana Gilness, pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(4)(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; that neither of
the known potential claimants is serving in the armed forces of the United States, and that
neither is an infant or incompetent person; that publication has been lawfully made in this
Order, p. 1 of 3
matter; that lawful notice was given to all potential claimants, known or unknown, either
through direct notice or by publication; that no claims, answers, or other pleadings have
been filed in response to such notice; that no extensions to the applicable time limits have
been requested, consented to, or granted by the court; and, that the clerk has entered
default, pursuant to Rule 55(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. Accordingly, the court finds and concludes
as follows:
1.
That process was lawfully executed in this action and returned according to
2.
That the Defendant Currency were lawfully arrested pursuant to the warrant
law;
of arrest in rem, pursuant to Rule G(3);
3.
That public notice of this forfeiture action was lawfully made on an official
government internet forfeiture website for a period of at least 30 consecutive days,
pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C);
4.
That Roger Ray Crumblin, Jr., and Diana Gilness, the known potential
claimants, have received direct notice of this forfeiture action, pursuant to Rule G(4)(b);
5.
That Roger Ray Crumblin, Jr., and Diana Gilness have failed to file a claim,
answer, or other responsive pleading, as required by Rule G(5);
6.
That neither Roger Ray Crumblin, Jr., nor Diana Gilness is serving in the
armed forces of the United States, and that neither is an infant or incompetent person;
7.
The other potential claimants were duly notified of the proposed forfeiture
through publication, pursuant to Rule G(4)(a);
8.
That no other person or entity has filed a claim, answer, or other responsive
pleading within the time fixed by law; and
Order, p. 2 of 3
9.
That the allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted.
NOW THEREFORE, based upon the above findings, and the court being otherwise
fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1.
All persons claiming any right, title or interest in or to the Defendant Currency
are hereby held in default, and any right, title, or interest in the Defendant Currency on the
part of any potential claimants are extinguished and forever barred.
2.
Default judgment shall be entered by the clerk against all potential claimants
to the Defendant Currency, and in favor of the United States.
3.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and
981(a)(1)(C), the Defendant Currency is hereby forfeited, condemned, quit-claimed and
abandoned to the United States of America.
4.
Clear title in and to the Defendant Currency is vested in the United States of
America, and no other right, title or interest exists therein. All other claims to the Defendant
Currency are hereby forever foreclosed and barred.
5.
The Defendant Currency forfeited herein shall be disposed of by the United
States as authorized by law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
January 30, 2012
Charleston, South Carolina
Order, p. 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?