Hartsock v. Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America LTD et al

Filing 175

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 170 Motion for Reconsideration. As stated in written order, reconsideration denied but prior order is designated for appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s. 1292(b). Signed by Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy on 1/19/16.(adeh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Theodore G. Hartsock, Jr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sarah Mills Hartsock, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America ) LTD, a foreign corporation; and ) The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00419-PMD-MGB ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 30, 2015 order, in which the Court overruled objections to an order issued by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker and adopted her order as its own (ECF Nos. 170, 143, & 137, respectively). Defendants ask that this Court alter portions of its order or, in the alternative, certify its order for immediate appeal. After carefully reviewing Defendants’ motion, as well as Plaintiff’s response thereto, this Court declines to alter its November 30 order by itself. As to the certification request, the Court has carefully considered the parties’ arguments as to what standard governs the parties’ dispute over Defendants’ trade secret. In this Court’s opinion, Magistrate Judge Baker’s order, which this Court adopted, involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, and an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Pursuant to § 1292(b), Defendants shall have ten days from the date of this order to apply to the Fourth Circuit for permission to appeal. All proceedings in this matter are hereby STAYED pending Defendants’ application and, if granted, during the appeal. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. January 19, 2016 Charleston, South Carolina 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?