Mixson v. Wal-Mart Corporation et al
Filing
13
JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (abuc)
AO 450 (SCD 04/2010) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina
Daniel Mark Mixson,
Plaintiff
v.
Wal-Mart Corporation; Chris D. Young, Loss
Prevention,
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
2:14-cv-00431-DCN
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)
dollars ($
recover from the defendant (name)
), which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of
the amount of
%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of
%, along with costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)
.
O other: the plaintiff, Daniel Mark Mixson, shall take nothing of the defendants; Wal-Mart Corporation and
Chris D. Young, from the complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and this action is dismissed without
prejudice.
This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury, the Honorable
’ tried by the Honorable
presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
presiding, without a jury and the above decision was reached.
O decided by the Honorable David C. Norton, United States District Judge, presiding, adopting the Report
and Recommendation set forth by the Honorable Paige J. Gossett, United States Magistrate Judge, which
dismissed the complaint without prejudice.
Date: May 6, 2014
ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK OF COURT
s/A. Buckingham
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?