Reed et al v. Big Water Resort LLC et al

Filing 76

ORDER denying 39 Motion to Certify Question to South Carolina Supreme Court Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 12/30/14.(akob, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION WILLIAM REED, DONNA REED, and BONNIE YOUMANS, JANE YATES, PHILLIP CAULDER, all individually and for the benefit and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BIG WATER RESORT, LLC; TLC HOLDINGS, LLC; RICHARD CLARK; JAMES THIGPEN; JIMMY “STEVE” LOVELL; and OCOEE, LLC, Defendants. BIG WATER RESORT, LLC; TLC HOLDINGS, LLC; RICHARD CLARK; JAMES THIGPEN; JIMMY “STEVE” LOVELL; OCOEE, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiffs, vs. M.B. HUTSON, a/k/a M.B. HUDSON, Third-Party Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:14-cv-1583-DCN ORDER This matter is before the court on a motion to certify two questions to the South Carolina Supreme Court brought by plaintiffs William Reed, Donna Reed, Bonnie Youmans, Jane Yates, and Phillip Caulder (“plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs have alleged a cause of action against defendants Richard Clark, James Thigpen, Jimmy “Steve” Lovell, and Big Water Resort, LLC under the South Carolina Timeshare Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 27-32-120. Am. Compl. ¶ 85. Pursuant to S.C. Code Ann § 27-32-120(C), plaintiffs seek a refund for the amounts they paid to purchase 1   membership interests in the Big Water Resort, LLC. Id.; Pls.’ Mot. 2. The questions plaintiffs move to certify pertain to whether the membership agreements at issue are “[v]acation time sharing lease plan[s]” under S.C. Code Ann. § 27-32-10(8). Pls.’ Mot. 3. For reasons that will be expounded in a future order, the court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. DAVID C. NORTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE December 30, 2014 Charleston, South Carolina   2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?