Wells v. SCDF defendant employees et al
ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wallace W Dixon. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint and Amended Complaint are summarily DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 7/30/2014.(ssam, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Ray Edward Wells,
aka Ray Anthony Wells, Ray Wells,
SCDF Defendant Employees; Larry W.
Powers; Dr. Salvatore Bianco; Nurse
Susan Blackwell; Warden Chuck Wright;
and The Medical Staff,
Civil Action No. 2:14-2091-TMC
Plaintiff Ray Edward Wells, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter
was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate
judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”), recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint and
Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of
process. (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report. (ECF
No. 20 at 12). Plaintiff timely filed objections. (ECF No. 24).
The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final
determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 27071 (1976). The court need not conduct a de novo review when a party makes only “general and
conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate’s proposed
findings and recommendations.” Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). In that
case, the court reviews the Report only for clear error. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident
Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).
As set forth above, Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report. (ECF No. 24).
However, his objections fail to address any specific, dispositive portion of the Report. The
objections are non-specific, unrelated to the dispositive portions of the Report, or merely restate
Plaintiff’s claims. The court has thoroughly reviewed the Report and Plaintiff’s objections and
finds no reason to deviate from the Report’s recommended disposition.
Accordingly, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 20) and
incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint and Amended
Complaint are summarily DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Timothy M. Cain
United States District Judge
July 30, 2014
Anderson, South Carolina
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4
of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?