Singletary et al v. Wells Fargo Corp et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT dismissing the Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41. (asni, )

AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
District of South Carolina

John G. Singletary and Carla C.
Singletary,
Plaintiffs
v.

Civil Action No.

2:14-2138-MBS

Wells Fargo Corp., its agents, servant
employees, and successors; Haynsworth
Sinkler Boyd PA; Mack Mac McQuillen; Howell
Morrison; and Len Hutchinson,
all jointly and severally,
Defendants
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION
The court has ordered that (check one):
’ the plaintiff (name)

recover from the defendant (name)

which includes prejudgment interest at the rate of

the amount of

%, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of

dollars ($

),

%, along with

costs.
’ the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name)
recover costs from the plaintiff (name)

.

O other: the Plaintiffs, take nothing of the Defendants, and this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule
41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This action was (check one):
’ tried by a jury with Judge
’ tried by Judge

presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict.
without a jury and the above decision was reached.

O decided by the Honorable Margaret B. Seymour, Senior United States District Judge presiding. The Court having
adopted the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wallace W. Dixon to dismiss.

Date: September 5, 2014

CLERK OF COURT
s/Angie Snipes
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk