Harrison v. Lee et al
Filing
13
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/23/2015.(cwhi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CARO&fNJ\
r
Eugene P. Harrison,
a/k/a Eugene Paul Harrison, Sr.
Plaintiff,
v.
Mr. Alex Lee, President; Ms. Ashley
Donna,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ZOl5 JAN 2b
A q: 08
Civil Action No. 2: 14-cv-4544-RMG
ORDER
--------------------------)
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the
Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 11) recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint
without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Court hereby adopts the
R&R. Plaintiff alleges that he suffered injury from a store's decision not to allow him to hold a
church fundraiser on store property. However, he fails to allege any facts that would support a
claim against Defendants.
Upon the issuance of the R&R, Plaintiff was advised that any written objections to the
R&R must be made within 14 days of service, and that in the absence of timely written
objections this Court would provide limited "clear error" review and Plaintiff would waive her
right to appeal the judgment of the District Court. (Dkt. No. 11 at 9). Plaintiff has not
responded to Defendant's motion, and has not filed objections to the R&R.
The Court has reviewed the R&R, the full administrative record in this matter and the
relevant legal authorities. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge ably and promptly
summarized the factual and legal issues and appropriately recommended that the Complaint
should be dismissed. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the R&R as the order of this Court.
fuc(F~
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court Judge
January <."3> ,2015
Charleston, South Carolina
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?